The Parks Alliance serves a unique role in this, raising money for some projects itself and selecting contractors, a role often served by government agencies. But that leaves some of their methodologies in the dark, the Budget and Legislative Analyst's report found.
What are the names of their anonymous donors? How are the contractors to build out our green spaces chosen? How does it use city funding it's granted? When the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department pitches in its own money, are they getting the most bang for their buck?
The lack of transparency may also allow Parks Alliance to circumvent good government practices developed by the city, the Budget Legislative Analyst wrote, including compliance with prevailing wage requirements for contractors and competitive bidding to find lower costs.
For a Richmond neighborhood playground, for instance, the $3 million budget was completely opaque, said Fred Brousseau, from the Budget Legislative Analyst's office.
"What we found is that the (memorandum of understanding) had a high-level preliminary budget but no detail as to what the costs were going to be for the design contractor, for example, that was being paid for by the Parks Alliance," he told the supervisors at Thursday's hearing. "We also found that there was no requirement for how the contractor was selected in this case."
"between" - Google News
November 21, 2021 at 03:00AM
https://ift.tt/3kZ65wS
SF Supervisors Issue Subpoena Into Records Between Parks Nonprofit and City, After Report Finds Lack of Transparency - KQED
"between" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2WkNqP8
https://ift.tt/2WkjZfX
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "SF Supervisors Issue Subpoena Into Records Between Parks Nonprofit and City, After Report Finds Lack of Transparency - KQED"
Post a Comment