Search

Derek Chauvin trial: Here’s why a third-degree murder charge is in the spotlight - TwinCities.com-Pioneer Press

datangep.blogspot.com

Jury selection in the trial of a former Minneapolis officer accused in the death of George Floyd was put on hold Monday while an appeals court considers whether to reinstate a third-degree murder charge against him.

Derek Chauvin is already facing a second-degree unintentional murder charge and a manslaughter charge. He has pleaded not guilty.

Floyd, who was Black, died May 25 after Chauvin, who is white, pressed his knee on Floyd’s neck for some nine minutes while he was handcuffed on the ground, pleading that he couldn’t breathe. Floyd’s death sparked months of mass protests nationwide over police brutality and race. In Minneapolis and some other cities, the civil unrest spiraled into violence. Other former officers who were present when Floyd died will face trial later this year.

Here’s a look at why the charge plays such a large role in the trial.

WHAT DO THE DIFFERENT DEGREES MEAN?

The degrees denote the seriousness of a crime. The more serious the crime, the higher the benchmarks that prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to convict.

First-degree murder is the most serious and results in life in prison if convicted. To convict, prosecutors must prove either that the act was preplanned or that other major crimes were committed with it, among other things.

Second-degree murder in Minnesota can be “intentional” or “unintentional,” which is the charge Chauvin faces, and is punishable by up to 40 years in prison if convicted. The second-degree murder charge requires prosecutors to prove Chauvin caused Floyd’s death while committing or trying to commit a felony — in this case, third-degree assault.

Third-degree murder would require a lower standard of proof than second-degree. To win a conviction, prosecutors would have to show only that Floyd’s death was caused by an act that was obviously dangerous, though not necessarily a felony. That would result in a maximum sentence of 25 years.

But there are caveats. Chauvin has no criminal history, which means he will probably end up serving about 12.5 years whether he is convicted of second- or third-degree murder.

Manslaughter, the least serious charge but also the one with the lowest burden of proof, means a maximum of just 10 years behind bars if convicted. The manslaughter charge has a lower bar, requiring proof that Chauvin caused Floyd’s death through negligence that created an unreasonable risk, and consciously took the chance of causing severe injury or death.

For those seeking justice in Floyd’s death, anything less than murder is likely to feel like injustice.

WHY WAS THAT CHARGE DISMISSED TO BEGIN WITH?

Chauvin’s lawyer sought to dismiss the charge, arguing  there was not probable cause to charge him with third-degree murder. The trial judge in Hennepin County District Court ruled last October that third-degree murder under Minnesota law requires proof that someone’s conduct was “eminently dangerous to others,” plural, not just to Floyd. The judge said there was no evidence that Chauvin endangered anyone else and threw out the charge. Prosecutors appealed.

They have cited a Minnesota Court of Appeals ruling in the case of former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor. Noor was convicted of third-degree murder in 2019 in the fatal shooting of Justine Ruszczyk Damond after she called 911 to report a possible sexual assault near her home. Noor, the only police officer ever convicted of murder for an on-duty incident in Minnesota, was sentenced to more than a decade in prison. The Court of Appeals recently upheld Noor’s conviction. Last week, the court ruled that the judge in Chauvin’s trial improperly dismissed the third-degree murder charge in the case and ordered him to reconsider his decision.

WHY PUSH TO HAVE IT ADDED AGAIN?

Very simply, reinstating the count could increase the prosecution’s odds of getting a murder conviction in what will be one of the highest-profile police trials in the U.S.

CAN HE BE CONVICTED WITHOUT IT?

Yes. But it’s not going to be as easy as some might think. Even with the bystander video that showed Chauvin pressing his knee into George Floyd’s neck and ignoring the man’s pleas, legal experts say the case isn’t a slam-dunk.

“It’s hard not to watch the video and conclude that the prosecutors will not have any trouble with this case,” said Susan Gaertner, the former head prosecutor in neighboring Ramsey County. “But it’s not that simple.”

The trial will come down to two key questions: Did Chauvin’s actions cause Floyd’s death, and were his actions reasonable?

The second-degree murder charge requires prosecutors to prove Chauvin caused Floyd’s death while committing or trying to commit a felony — in this case, third-degree assault. Prosecutors don’t have to prove that Chauvin was the sole cause of Floyd’s death — only that his conduct was a “substantial causal factor.” The manslaughter charge has a lower bar, requiring proof that Chauvin caused Floyd’s death through negligence that created an unreasonable risk, and consciously took the chance of causing severe injury or death.

Chauvin’s attorney, Eric Nelson, argues in court documents that Floyd likely died from fentanyl he consumed, or a combination of fentanyl, methamphetamine and underlying health conditions — not as a result of Chauvin’s knee on his neck.

The Hennepin County medical examiner’s office said that Floyd died of “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.” It also cited heart disease and drug use as factors that could have contributed to his death.

WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

Prosecutors filed a request with the state’s Court of Appeals to put the trial on hold until the issue is resolved. They worry, in part, that they could lose the chance to try Chauvin later on the third-degree murder charge if the current trial goes forward while the appeal is ongoing.

The judge overseeing the case, Peter Cahill, sent potential jurors home for the day, while prosecutors tried to contact the appellate court. Cahill took a recess to give the Court of Appeals time to respond but brought attorneys back into the courtroom Monday afternoon to deal with other matters.

Cahill later said jury selection would resume Tuesday barring an order from the appellate court.

There was no indication when that court will rule, but a hold could delay Chauvin’s trial for weeks.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"degree" - Google News
March 10, 2021 at 11:30PM
https://ift.tt/3l5kvKF

Derek Chauvin trial: Here’s why a third-degree murder charge is in the spotlight - TwinCities.com-Pioneer Press
"degree" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2zPqEHn
https://ift.tt/2WkjZfX

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Derek Chauvin trial: Here’s why a third-degree murder charge is in the spotlight - TwinCities.com-Pioneer Press"

Post a Comment


Powered by Blogger.